BJP MP Nishikant Dubey says CJI Sanjiv Khanna responsible for all civil wars in India, mounts attack on SC
Nishikant Dubey accused the Supreme Court of arrogating to itself Parliament's legislative powers by striking down laws passed by the legislature and even giving directions to the President who, Dubey noted, is the appointing authority of Supreme Court judges.

BJP MP Nishikant Dubey Blames CJI Sanjiv Khanna for Civil Wars in India
In a shocking statement that has garnered significant media attention, BJP MP Nishikant Dubey has openly accused Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sanjiv Khanna of being responsible for all civil wars in the country. This bold assertion comes amid rising tensions surrounding various judicial decisions made by the Supreme Court and reflects increasing criticism from political figures regarding the judiciary’s role in contemporary issues.
Context of the Accusation
The backdrop for Dubey's comments lies in ongoing debates about the judiciary's influence on governance and public policy. Dubey argues that judicial interventions have often led to societal conflict and discord, positing that the actions taken by CJI Khanna directly contribute to an atmosphere of unrest. As a member of the ruling party, his statements resonate with the ongoing narrative some politicians have sought to promote regarding the judiciary's perceived overreach.
Details of the Attack on the Supreme Court
During his address, Dubey expressed dissatisfaction with several key rulings and their implications for civil order. He emphasized the need for an accountable judiciary that is more reflective of the public’s sentiment and less prone to what he termed "judicial activism." By directly targeting CJI Khanna, Dubey has sparked a broader conversation about the intersection of law, governance, and social harmony in India.
Public Response and Implications
The comments have stirred reactions across the political spectrum. Supporters of Dubey appreciate his bold stance against what they perceive as judicial overreach, while critics argue that such accusations undermine the independence of the judiciary and threaten the delicate balance necessary for a functioning democracy. The ensuing debate will likely have implications for the relationship between the legislature and judiciary in the months to come.
Conclusion
As the situation develops, citizens and political analysts alike will be keenly observing how these accusations may influence public opinion and political dynamics in India. The dialogue surrounding the judiciary, particularly the role of the Supreme Court in civil affairs, will remain at the forefront of political discourse. For more updates, visit dharmyuddh.com.
News by dharmyuddh.com Keywords: BJP MP Nishikant Dubey statement, CJI Sanjiv Khanna civil wars, Supreme Court attack, judiciary influence on governance, political figures criticism judiciary, judicial interventions India, civil order implications, public sentiment judiciary, political discourse in India, legislature judiciary relationship.